I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
2014/C 31/06
Language of the case: Spanish
Applicant: Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A.
Defendants: Fernando Quintano Ujeta and María Isabel Sánchez García
1.Under Council Directive 93/13/EEC (1) of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts, and in particular Articles 6(1) and 7(1) thereof, and in order to ensure the protection of consumers and users in accordance with the principles of equivalence and effectiveness[,] must a national court, when it finds there to be an unfair contractual clause concerning default interest, declare that as a consequence any type of default interest is invalid, even that which may result from the subsidiary application of a national provision such as Article 1108 of the Civil Code, the Second Transitional Provision of Law No 1/2013, in conjunction with Article 114 of the Law on mortgages, or Article 4 of Royal Decree-Law No 6/2012, and regard itself as not being bound by any recalculation which the professional may have carried out in accordance with the Second Transitional Provision of Law No 1/13?
2.Must the Second Transitional Provision of Law No 1/2013 be interpreted as meaning that it may not constitute an obstacle to the protection of consumer interests?
3.Under Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts, and in particular Articles 6(1) and 7(1) thereof, and in order to ensure the protection of consumers and users in accordance with the principles of equivalence and effectiveness[,] must a national court, when it finds there to be an unfair clause concerning accelerated repayment, declare that that clause does not form part of the contract and draw the conclusions inherent in such a finding[,] even where the professional has waited the minimum time provided for in the national provision?
(1) OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29.