EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) of 16 October 1990. # Christian Brumter v Council of the European Communities. # Official - Promotion of an official on secondment - Consideration of comparative merits - Institution of a consultative procedure - Appointing authority's discretion. # Case T-128/89.

ECLI:EU:T:1990:59

61989TJ0128

October 16, 1990
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Avis juridique important

61989A0128

European Court reports 1990 Page II-00545 Pub.RJ Page Pub somm

Summary

1 . When, by a decision of an internal nature, the appointing authority voluntarily institutes a compulsory consultative procedure which is not prescribed by the Staff Regulations, it is obliged to observe that procedure, which cannot be regarded as having no legal significance ( see the judgment in Case 282/81 Ragusa v Commission [1983] ECR 1245 ).

2 . The appointing authority has wide discretion as regards promotions, and judicial review must be restricted to examining whether, regard being had to the various considerations which may have influenced the administration in making its assessment, the latter has remained within reasonable limits and has not used its power in a manifestly incorrect way ( see the judgment in Case 111/86 Delauche v Commission [1987] ECR 5345 ).

3 . It is established case-law that a decision is vitiated by a misuse of powers only if it appears, on the basis of objective, relevant and consistent evidence, to have been taken for purposes other than those stated .

Parties

In Case T-128/89

Christian Brumter, a former official of the Council, an official of the Commission of the European Communities, residing in Brussels, represented by Jean-Pierre Spitzer, of the Paris Bar, with an address for service in Luxembourg at the Chambers of Aloyse May, 31 Grand-Rue,

applicant,

Council of the European Communities, represented by Gijs Peeters, Adviser in its Legal Department, acting as Agent, with an address for service in Luxembourg at the office of Joerg Kaeser, Manager of the Legal Directorate of the European Investment Bank, 100 Boulevard Konrad Adenauer,

defendant,

APPLICATION for the annulment of the decision of 25 November 1988 of the Secretary General of the Council of the European Communities promoting eight officials to Grade A5,

THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE ( Fourth Chamber ),

composed of D.A.O . Edward, President, R . Schintgen and R . García-Valdecasas, Judges,

( The grounds of the judgment are not reproduced )

Operative part

hereby :

1 . Dismisses the application;

2 . Orders the parties to bear their own costs .

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia