EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-255/11: Action brought on 20 May 2011 — Fellah v Council

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011TN0255

62011TN0255

May 20, 2011
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

16.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 211/28

(Case T-255/11)

2011/C 211/61

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Zakaria Fellah (New York, USA) (represented by: G. Collard, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

hold that, in relation to the applicant, Mr Zakaria Fellah, Council Regulation (EU) No 330/2011 of 6 April 2011 and Council Decision 2011/221/CFSP of 6 April 2011, published on 7 April 2011 in the Official Journal of the European Union, are factually unfounded;

in consequence:

annul Council Regulation (EU) No 330/2011 of 6 April 2011 and Council Decision 2011/221/CFSP of 6 April 2011;

in the alternative, order that the name of Mr Zakaria Fellah be removed from the lists annexed to the said regulation and the said decision.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.

1.First plea in law, alleging infringement of the duty to state reasons, inasmuch as the grounds for including the name of the applicant in the list of persons and bodies to which restrictive measures apply were sterotyped, without mention of any precise factual element allowing the relevance of the inclusion of that name to be assessed.

2.Second plea in law, alleging manifest error of assessment, in so far as:

the applicant is accused of financing the administration of Mr L. Gbagbo, whereas, first, the applicant essentially carried out his functions with Mr L. Gbagbo at a time when the latter was recognised as legitimate head of state by the international community, and, second, the applicant did not have resources allowing him to finance the adminstration of Mr L. Gbagbo;

the contested measures appear to be devoid of purpose since 11 April 2011, Mr L. Gbagbo having been captured on that date.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia