- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-220/17: Judgment of the General Court of 26 April 2018 — Pfalzmarkt für Obst und Gemüse v EUIPO (100 % Pfalz) (European Union trade mark — Application for EU figurative mark 100 % Pfalz — Absolute ground for refusal — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Obligation to state reasons — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001))
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017TA0220
62017TA0220
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-220/17) (*1)
‘(European Union trade mark — Application for EU figurative mark 100 % Pfalz — Absolute ground for refusal — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Obligation to state reasons — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001))’
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Pfalzmarkt für Obst und Gemüse eG (Mutterstadt, Germany) (represented by: C. Gehweiler and C. Weber, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Söder and D. Walicka, acting as Agents)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 7 February 2017 (Case R 1549/2016-1) concerning an application for registration of the figurative sign 100 % Pfalz as an EU trade mark.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Pfalzmarkt für Obst und Gemüse eG to pay the costs.
*
(*1) OJ C 178, 6.6.2017.