EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-11/20: Action brought on 9 January 2020 — Paravan v EUIPO — paragon (Paragon)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TN0011

62020TN0011

January 9, 2020
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 68/59

(Case T-11/20)

(2020/C 68/67)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Paravan GmbH (Pfronstetten-Aichelau, Germany) (represented by: I. Jung and L. Delpy, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: paragon GmbH & Co. KGaA (Delbrück, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark Paragon — EU trade mark No 3 705 051

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 October 2019 in Case R 28/2019-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

annul the contested decision and uphold the decision of the Cancellation Division of EUIPO of 10 December 2018 in cancellation proceedings No 14 618 C concerning EU trade mark Paragon No 3 705 051;

alternatively,

amend the contested decision by annulling the decision of the Cancellation Division of EUIPO of 10 December 2018 in cancellation proceedings No 14 618 C in so far as the EU trade mark Paragon No 3 705 051 was revoked, with effect from 14 March 2017, for ‘carriage body parts for the tuning of motor vehicles for locomotion by land; microphones for hands-free kits for cell phones for motor vehicles for locomotion by land; clocks for motor vehicles for locomotion by land’;

order EUIPO to pay the costs, including the costs incurred in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.

Pleas in law

infringement of Article 58(1)(a) and 58(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

alternatively, infringement of Article 58(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia