- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-845/14: Order of the General Court of 30 November 2015 — August Brötje v OHIM (HydroComfort) (Community trade mark — Application for the Community word mark HydroComfort — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014TB0845
62014TB0845
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 38/57
(Case T-845/14) (<span class="super">1</span>)
((Community trade mark - Application for the Community word mark HydroComfort - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law))
(2016/C 038/76)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: August Brötje GmbH (Rastede, Germany) (represented by: S. Pietzcker and C. Spintig, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: W. Schramek, D. Walicka and A. Schifko, acting as Agents)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 23 October 2014 (Case R 1302/2014-5), concerning an application for registration of the word sign HydroComfort as a Community trade mark.
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed.
2.August Brötje GmbH shall pay the costs.
(<span class="note"> <a id="ntr1-C_2016038EN.01005701-E0001" href="#ntc1-C_2016038EN.01005701-E0001">*1</a> </span>) OJ C 89, 16.3.2015.