- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-249/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 11 April 2018 — Staatssecretaris van Financiën, Other party: CEVA Freight Holland B.V.
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018CN0249
62018CN0249
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C-249/18)
Language of the case: Dutch
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Staatssecretaris van Financiën
Questions referred
1.Must Article 78 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 (1) establishing the Community Customs Code be interpreted as meaning that a declarant, in the context of a subsequent entry in the accounts with reference to the second subparagraph of Article 147(1) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 (2) laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation No 2913/92, can choose another, lower transaction price of imported goods with a view to reducing the customs debt?
(a)Is the determination of the time at which communication to the debtor took place, in the context of the application of Article 221(3) of Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92, a question of EU law?
(b)If Question 2(a) is answered in the affirmative, must Article 221(3) of Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 be interpreted as meaning that the communication to the debtor referred to in that provision must have been received within the three-year period after a customs debt was incurred, or is it sufficient that that communication was sent to the debtor within that period?
Language of the case: Dutch
(1) Regulation of 12 October 1992 (OJ 1992 L 302, p. 1).
(2) Regulation of 2 July 1993 (OJ 1993 L 253, p. 1).