EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Joined Cases C-106/19 and C-232/19: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 14 July 2022 — Italian Republic (C-106/19), Comune di Milano (C-232/19) v Council of the European Union, European Parliament (Action for annulment — Law governing the institutions — Regulation (EU) 2018/1718 — Location of the seat of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in Amsterdam (Netherlands) — Article 263 TFEU — Admissibility — Interest in bringing proceedings — Locus standi — Direct and individual concern — Decision adopted by the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States in the margins of a Council meeting in order to determine the location of the seat of an EU agency — Absence of binding effects in the EU legal order — Prerogatives of the European Parliament)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019CA0106

62019CA0106

July 14, 2022
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

5.9.2022

Official Journal of the European Union

C 340/3

(Joined Cases C-106/19 and C-232/19) (*)

(Action for annulment - Law governing the institutions - Regulation (EU) 2018/1718 - Location of the seat of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in Amsterdam (Netherlands) - Article 263 TFEU - Admissibility - Interest in bringing proceedings - Locus standi - Direct and individual concern - Decision adopted by the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States in the margins of a Council meeting in order to determine the location of the seat of an EU agency - Absence of binding effects in the EU legal order - Prerogatives of the European Parliament)

(2022/C 340/03)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicants: Italian Republic (represented by: G. Palmieri, Agent, and by C. Colelli, S. Fiorentino and G. Galluzzo, avvocati dello Stato) (C-106/19), Comune di Milano (represented by: J. Alberti, M. Condinanzi, A. Neri and F. Sciaudone, avvocati) (C-232/19)

Defendants: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer, J. Bauerschmidt, F. Florindo Gijón and E. Rebasti, Agents), European Parliament (represented by: I. Anagnostopoulou, A. Tamás and L. Visaggio, Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendants: Kingdom of the Netherlands (represented by: M.K. Bulterman and J. Langer, Agents), European Commission (represented by: K. Herrmann, D. Nardi and P.J.O. Van Nuffel, Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Dismisses the actions;

2.Orders the Italian Republic, the Council of the European Union and the European Parliament to bear their own costs in Case C-106/19;

3.Orders the Comune di Milano, the Council of the European Union and the European Parliament to bear their own costs in Case C-232/19;

4.Orders the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the European Commission to bear their own costs.

*

Language of the case: Italian.

(*)

OJ C 112, 25.3.2019.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia