I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Applicant: Deutsche Bahn AG (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: E. Haag, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: DSB (Copenhagen, Denmark)
—Annul the contested decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) of 30 April 2009 and the decision of the Opposition Division of 26 July 2007;
—order OHIM to pay all the costs of the proceedings, including those incurred during the appeal and opposition proceedings.
Applicant for a Community trade mark: DSB
Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘IC4’ for goods in Class 39 (application No 4 255 411)
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: the applicant
Mark or sign cited in opposition: the word mark ‘ICE’ for goods and services in Classes 6, 7, 9, 11, 12, 19, 37, 38, 39, 41 and 42 (Community trade mark No 170 605) and the German figurative mark ‘IC’ for services in Classes 39 and 42 (No 1 009 258)
Decision of the Opposition Division: rejection of the opposition
Decision of the Board of Appeal: dismissal of the appeal
Pleas in law: infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (1) since there is a likelihood of confusion between the opposing marks.
(1) Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1)