EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-218/23 P: Appeal brought on 4 April 2023 by NS against the judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) delivered on 25 January 2023 in Case T-805/21, NS v Parliament

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CN0218

62023CN0218

April 4, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

17.7.2023

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/19

(Case C-218/23 P)

(2023/C 252/22)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: NS (represented by: L. Levi, avocate)

Other party to the proceedings: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:

declare the present appeal admissible and founded;

set aside the judgment of the General Court of 25 January 2023 in Case T-805/21;

consequently, grant the appellant the relief sought at first instance, and, therefore:

annul the decision of 21 January 2021 reassigning the appellant to the post of Adviser in the Directorate-General for the Presidency and, to the extent necessary, the decision of 8 March 2021 to recover the overpayment;

in so far as necessary, annul the decision of 16 September 2021 rejecting the appellant’s claim of 7 April 2021;

make good the appellant’s material and non-material damage;

order the respondent to pay in full the costs of both sets of proceedings.

Grounds of appeal and main arguments

In support of her appeal, the appellant relies on the following grounds;

1.The judgment under appeal fails to have regard to the concept of law giving the opportunity to be heard, makes incorrect legal characterisations and distorts the documents before the Court. The General Court failed to have regard to its obligation to state reasons.

2.The judgment under appeal fails to have regard to the obligation to state reasons.

3.The judgment under appeal fails to comply with the duty to have regard for the welfare of officials.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia