I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
2012/C 287/69
Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish
Applicant: Grupo T Diffusión (El Prat de Llobregat, Spain) (represented by: A. Lasala Grimalt, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: ABR Producción Contemporánea, SL (Barcelona, Spain)
—Annul the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 1 June 2012 in Case R 1622/2010-3 concerning invalidity proceedings in respect of Community design No 000 42 7448-0001 and declare that design to be fully effective and valid, with no order for costs against Grupo T Diffusión, SA in respect of the costs of ABR and OHIM
Registered Community design in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: Design for a lamp — Registered Community Design No 000 42 7448-0001
Proprietor of the Community design: The applicant
Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community design: ABR Producción Contemporánea, SL
Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity: Prior design of a ‘Cypress’ standard lamp
Decision of the Cancellation Division: Application for a declaration of invalidity upheld
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed
Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 6 and 7 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002