- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-912/16: Action brought on 22 December 2016 — RRTec v EUIPO — Mobotec (RROFA)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TN0912
62016TN0912
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
27.2.2017
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 63/34
(Case T-912/16)
(2017/C 063/46)
Language in which the application was lodged: Polish
Parties
Applicant: RRTec sp. z o.o. (Gliwice, Poland) (represented by: T. Gawrylczyk, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Mobotec AB (Gothenburg, Sweden)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark containing the word element ‘RROFA’ — Application for registration No 12 699 534
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 5 October 2016 in Case R 2392/2015-1
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(a) and (b) of Regulation No 207/2009.