- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-433/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 6 June 2019 — Ellmes Property Services Limited v SP
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019CN0433
62019CN0433
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
21.10.2019
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 357/4
(Case C-433/19)
(2019/C 357/07)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Ellmes Property Services Limited
Defendant: SP
Questions referred
1.Is the first alternative in the first subparagraph of Article 24(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (\u003ci\u003eBrussels Ia Regulation\u003c/i\u003e) to be interpreted as meaning that actions brought by a co-owner seeking to prohibit another co-owner from carrying out changes to his property subject to co-ownership, in particular to its designated use, arbitrarily and without the consent of the other co-owners, concern the assertion of a right \u003ci\u003ein rem\u003c/i\u003e?
2.If the first question should be answered in the negative: Is Article 7(1)(a) of the Brussels Ia Regulation to be interpreted as meaning that the actions referred to in paragraph 1 concern contractual obligations to be performed at the location of the property?
Language of the case: German.
(1) OJ 2012 L 351, p. 1.