EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-189/16: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 December 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen -- Sweden) — Boguslawa Zaniewicz-Dybeck v Pensionsmyndigheten (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social security for migrant workers — Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 — Article 46(2) — Article 47(1)(d) — Article 50 — Guaranteed pension — Minimum benefit — Calculation of pension entitlement)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016CA0189

62016CA0189

December 7, 2017
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

12.2.2018

Official Journal of the European Union

C 52/4

(Case C-189/16) (<a id="ntc1-C_2018052EN.01000401-E0001" href="#ntr1-C_2018052EN.01000401-E0001"> (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)</a>

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Social security for migrant workers - Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 - Article 46(2) - Article 47(1)(d) - Article 50 - Guaranteed pension - Minimum benefit - Calculation of pension entitlement))

(2018/C 052/05)

Language of the case: Swedish

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Boguslawa Zaniewicz-Dybeck

Defendant: Pensionsmyndigheten

Operative part of the judgment

1.Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of the Council of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community, as amended and updated by Council Regulation (EC) No 118/97 of 2 December 1996, as amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 1606/98 of 29 June 1998, is to be interpreted as meaning that, when the competent institution of a Member State calculates a minimum benefit, such as the guaranteed pension at issue in the main proceedings, it is not inappropriate to apply Article 46(2) or Article 47(1)(d) of the regulation. Such a benefit must be calculated in accordance with Article 50 of the regulation, in conjunction with the provisions of national law, without, however, applying national provisions, such as those in the main proceedings, providing for a pro rata calculation;

2.Regulation No 1408/71, as amended and updated by Regulation No 118/97, as amended by Regulation No 1606/98, and in particular Article 50 of that regulation, is to be interpreted as not precluding the legislation of a Member State under which, when calculating a minimum benefit such as the guaranteed pension at issue in the main proceedings, the competent institution must take account of all the retirement pensions which the person concerned actually receives from one or more other Member States.

*

Language of the case: Swedish

ECLI:EU:C:2018:140

(2018/C 052/05)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia