- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-1132/23: Judgment of the General Court of 23 October 2024 – Olvi v EUIPO – Koninklijke De Kuyper (FIZZ Cider) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Figurative mark FIZZ Cider – Absolute grounds for invalidity – Descriptive character – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and Article 59(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023TA1132
62023TA1132
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2024/7343
16.12.2024
(Case T-1132/23)
(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Figurative mark FIZZ Cider - Absolute grounds for invalidity - Descriptive character - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and Article 59(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal - Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 - Obligation to state reasons - Right to be heard - Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)
(C/2024/7343)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Olvi Oyj (Iisalmi, Finland) (represented by: K. Rantala, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Klee, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Koninklijke De Kuyper BV (Schiedam, Netherlands)
Re:
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 27 September 2023 (Case R 2011/2022-1).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders each party to bear its own costs.
—
Language of the case: English.
(1) OJ C C/2024/969, 29.1.2024.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7343/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—