- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-14/15: Action brought on 14 January 2015 — European Parliament v Council of the European Union
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015CN0014
62015CN0014
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
23.3.2015
Official Journal of the European Union
C 96/7
(Case C-14/15)
(2015/C 096/09)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: European Parliament (represented by: F. Drexler, A. Caiola, M. Pencheva, acting as Agents)
Defendant: Council of the European Union
Form of order sought
—annul Council Decision 2014/731/EU of 9 October 2014 on the launch of automated data exchange with regard to Vehicle Registration Data (VRD) in Malta (1), Council Decision 2014/743/EU of 21 October 2014 on the launch of automated data exchange with regard to Vehicle Registration Data (VRD) in Cyprus (2), and Council Decision 2014/744/EU of 21 October 2014 on the launch of automated data exchange with regard to Vehicle Registration Data (VRD) in Estonia (3);
—order Council of the European Union to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
The Parliament invokes two pleas in law alleging infringement of the Treaties, first, and infringement of an essential procedural requirement, secondly, in support of its action for annulment.
In the first place, the Parliament considers that the Council used an inappropriate legal basis in order to adopt the contested decisions.
In the second place, the Parliament complains that the Council used a decision-making procedure which is legally incorrect.
(1) OJ 2014 L 302, p. 56.
(2) OJ 2014 L 308, p. 100.
(3) OJ 2014 L 308, p. 102.