I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-316/18) (*)
(State aid - Postal sector - Universal service obligation - Decision not to raise any objections - Safeguarding procedural rights - Duration of the procedure - Complete and sufficient examination of the case by the Commission - Compensation for the discharge of the universal service obligation - Service of general economic interest - Directive 97/67/EC - Net avoided cost methodology - Obligation to state reasons)
(2020/C 433/51)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: První novinová společnost a.s., successor in law to Mediaservis s.r.o. (Prague, Czech Republic) (represented by: D. Vosol and C. Schneider, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn, D. Recchia and K. Blanck, acting as Agents)
Interveners in support of the defendant: Czech Republic (represented by: M. Smolek, J. Vláčil, T. Müller and I. Gavrilová, acting as Agents), Česká pošta s. p. (Prague) (represented by: P. Kadlec, lawyer)
Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Commission Decision C(2018) 753 final of 19 February 2018, State aid SA.45281 (2017/N) and State aid SA. 44859 (2016/FC), declaring that the compensations granted by the Czech Republic to Česká pošta for the performance of its postal activities under a universal service obligation for the period 2013 to 2017 constitute State aid compatible with the internal market, pursuant to Article 106(2) TFEU.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders První novinová společnost a.s., successor in law to Mediaservis s. r. o., to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;
3.Orders the Czech Republic and Česká pošta s. p. to bear their own costs.
(*) Language of the case: English.
(1) OJ C 276, 6.8.2018.