- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-98/22: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 22 December 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Paris — France) — Eurelec Trading SCRL, Scabel SA v Ministre de l’Économie et des Finances (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Jurisdiction and recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters — Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 — Article 1(1) — Concept of ‘civil and commercial matters’ — Action brought by a public authority seeking a declaration of the existence of restrictive practices, an order penalising those practices and an order that they cease)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022CA0098
62022CA0098
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 63/10
(Case C-98/22) (*)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Judicial cooperation in civil matters - Jurisdiction and recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters - Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 - Article 1(1) - Concept of ‘civil and commercial matters’ - Action brought by a public authority seeking a declaration of the existence of restrictive practices, an order penalising those practices and an order that they cease)
(2023/C 63/13)
Language of the case: French
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicants: Eurelec Trading SCRL, Scabel SA
Defendant: Ministre de l’Économie et des Finances
Intervening parties: Groupement d’achat des centres Édouard Leclerc (GALEC), Association des centres distributeurs Édouard Leclerc (ACDLEC)
Operative part of the judgment
Article 1(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters
must be interpreted as meaning that the concept of ‘civil and commercial matters’, within the meaning of that provision, does not include an action of a public authority of a Member State against companies established in another Member State seeking a declaration of the existence of restrictive practices, an order penalising those practices and an order that they cease in relation to suppliers established in the first Member State, where that public authority exercises powers to bring proceedings or powers of investigation falling outside the scope of the ordinary legal rules applicable to relationships between private individuals.
(*) Language of the case: French.