- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-96/20: Action brought on 20 February 2020 — Gruppe Nymphenburg Consult v EUIPO (Limbic® Types)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TN0096
62020TN0096
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
8.6.2020
Official Journal of the European Union
C 191/18
(Case T-96/20)
(2020/C 191/25)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Gruppe Nymphenburg Consult AG (Munich, Germany) (represented by: R Kunze and G. Würtenberger, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Trade mark at issue: Application for EU word mark Limbic® Types — Application No 12 316 469
Contested decision: Decision of the EUIPO Grand Board of Appeal of 2 December 2019 in Case R 1276/2017-G
Forms of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 72(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 95 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 96 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.