- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-671/20: Judgment of the General Court of 23 February 2022 — OA v EESC (Civil service — Officials — Psychological harassment — Disciplinary procedure — Disciplinary penalty — Written warning — Rights of the defence — Error of assessment — Liability)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TA0671
62020TA0671
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
25.4.2022
Official Journal of the European Union
C 171/28
(Case T-671/20) (*)
(Civil service - Officials - Psychological harassment - Disciplinary procedure - Disciplinary penalty - Written warning - Rights of the defence - Error of assessment - Liability)
(2022/C 171/35)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: OA (represented by: M. Casado García-Hirschfeld and M. Aboudi, lawyers)
Defendant: European Social and Economic Committee (represented by: M. Pascua Mateo, K. Gambino, X. Chamodraka, A. Carvajal García-Valdecasas and L. Camarena Januzec, acting as Agents, and by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)
Re:
Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking, first, annulment of Decision No 293/19 of the EESC of 5 December 2019 imposing the penalty of a written warning on the applicant and, second, compensation for the material and non-material damage which the applicant allegedly suffered.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Annuls Decision No 293/19 of the European Economic and Social Committee (EESC) of 5 December 2019 imposing the penalty of a written warning on OA;
2.Dismisses the action as to the remainder;
3.Orders the EESC to pay the costs.
(*) Language of the case: French.
(1) OJ C 9, 11.1.2021.