I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
(1)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Common system of value added tax (VAT) - Directive 2006/112/EC - Article 273 - Article 49(3) and Article 50 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Principle ne bis in idem - Duplication of criminal and administrative penalties in respect of the same offence - Financial penalty and sealing of a commercial premises - Provisional enforcement of sealing - Principle of proportionality)
(C/2025/4556)
Language of the case: Bulgarian
Appellant:
‘Beach and bar management’ EOOD
Respondent: Nachalnik na otdel ‘Operativni deynosti’ – Burgas
Article 325 TFEU, Article 273 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax, and Article 50 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union
must be interpreted as precluding national legislation which provides for the imposition of a financial penalty on a taxable person on the ground that he or she has not issued fiscal cash register receipts relating to sales made where that offence has already given rise to the imposition of a coercive administrative measure to seal the business premises in which that offence was committed and prohibiting access thereto.
Article 273 of Directive 2006/112 and Article 49(3) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights
must be interpreted as precluding national legislation which provides for, as an administrative penalty, a financial measure of a high amount without the court hearing a challenge to that measure having the procedural possibility of imposing an amount less than that provided for by that legislation or another more lenient type of penalty.
—
(1) OJ C, C/2024/1673.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4556/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—