EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-101/11: Action brought on 23 February 2011 — Mizuno v OHIM — Golfino (G)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011TN0101

62011TN0101

February 23, 2011
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

16.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 120/16

(Case T-101/11)

2011/C 120/37

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Mizuno Corp. (Osaka, Japan) (represented by: T. Raab and H. Lauf, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Golfino AG (Glinde, Germany)

Form of order sought

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 15 December 2010 in Case R 821/2010-1 in its entirety;

Order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: the applicant

Community trade mark concerned: the figurative mark containing the letter ‘G’ together with other symbols, for goods in Class 25

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Golfino AG

Mark or sign cited in opposition: the figurative mark containing the letter ‘G’ together with a plus sign, for goods and services in Classes 18, 25 and 35

Decision of the Opposition Division: the opposition was rejected

Decision of the Board of Appeal: the appeal was granted and the application was rejected

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) and indirectly of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (1) as there is no likelihood of confusion between the marks at issue

Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).

* * *

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia