I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
(EU trade mark - Application for EU word mark Münchner Wohnen - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Duty to state reasons - Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
(C/2025/2398)
Language of the case: German
Applicant: Münchner Wohnen GmbH (Munich, Germany) (represented by: A. Kockläuner and O. Nilgen, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Ringelhann, acting as Agent)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks partial annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 19 December 2023 (Case R 1288/2023-1).
1.The action is dismissed.
2.Each party shall bear its own costs.
—
(1) OJ C C/2024/2174, 25.3.2024.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2398/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—