EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Joined Cases C-294/19 and C-304/19: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 29 April 2021 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Constanţa — Romania) — Agenţia de Plăţi şi Intervenţie pentru Agricultură — Centrul Judeţean Tulcea v SC Piscicola Tulcea SA (C-294/19), Ira Invest SRL v Agenţia de Plăţi şi Intervenţie pentru Agricultură — Centrul Judeţean Tulcea (C-304/19) (References for a preliminary ruling — Agriculture — Common agricultural policy (CAP) — Direct support schemes — Eligible hectare — Aquaculture facility — Land use — Actual use for agricultural purposes — Use complying with the entries in the land register)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019CA0294

62019CA0294

April 29, 2021
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

5.7.2021

Official Journal of the European Union

C 263/2

(Joined Cases C-294/19 and C-304/19) (*)

(References for a preliminary ruling - Agriculture - Common agricultural policy (CAP) - Direct support schemes - Eligible hectare - Aquaculture facility - Land use - Actual use for agricultural purposes - Use complying with the entries in the land register)

(2021/C 263/02)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Agenţia de Plăţi şi Intervenţie pentru Agricultură — Centrul Judeţean Tulcea (C-294/19), Ira Invest SRL (C-304/19)

Defendants: SC Piscicola Tulcea SA (C-294/19), Agenţia de Plăţi şi Intervenţie pentru Agricultură — Centrul Judeţean Tulcea (C-304/19)

Operative part of the judgment

Article 2(h) and Article 34(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 of 19 January 2009 establishing common rules for direct support schemes for farmers under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers, amending Regulations (EC) No 1290/2005, (EC) No 247/2006, (EC) No 378/2007 and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 and Article 4(1)(e) and Article 32(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing rules for direct payments to farmers under support schemes within the framework of the common agricultural policy and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 637/2008 and Regulation No 73/2009 must be interpreted as meaning that areas categorised under national law as intended for aquaculture activities, but that are or have been actually used for agricultural purposes, are agricultural areas.

(*)

Language of the case: Romanian

* * *

(1)

OJ C 288, 26.8.2019.

ECLI:EU:C:2021:140

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia