EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-12/08 P: Appeal brought on 4 January 2008 by M against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal delivered on 19 October 2007 in Case F-23/07, M v EMEA

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62008TN0012

62008TN0012

January 1, 2008
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 64/59

(Case T-12/08 P)

(2008/C 64/95)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: M (Broxbourne, United Kingdom) (represented by S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N Louis and E. Marchal, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings: European Medicines Agency (EMEA)

Form of order sought by the appellant

set aside the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 19 October 2007 in M v European Medicines Agency in Case F-23/07;

annul the decision of the EMEA of 25 October 2006 in so far as it dismisses the request of 8 August to consult the Invalidity Committee;

annul the decision of the EMEA dismissing the request for compensation;

order the defendant to pay the costs at first instance and on appeal.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In his appeal, the appellant asks the Court to set aside the order of the Civil Service Tribunal dismissing, on the ground that it is inadmissible, the action for annulment of the decision of 25 October 2006 by which the European Medicines Agency dismissed his request to set up and Invalidity Committee.

In support of his appeal, the appellant puts forward a single plea alleging infringement of Community law. He claims that the Civil Service Tribunal has committed an error of interpretation with respect to the scope of his action at first instance and, therefore, it gave a ruling ultra petita. He also claims that the Civil Service Tribunal infringed Article 33(1) and (2) of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the Communities.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia