- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-851/19: Action brought on 16 December 2019 – Body Attack Sports Nutrition v EUIPO – Sakkari (SAKKATTACK)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TN0851
62019TN0851
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
24.2.2020
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 61/49
—
(Case T-851/19)
(2020/C 61/63)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Body Attack Sports Nutrition GmbH & Co. KG (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: S. Labesius, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Maria Sakkari (Nicosia, Cyprus)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark SAKKATTACK in the colours black, red, yellow, white and grey – Application for registration No 16 603 557
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 October 2019 in Case R 2560/2018-4
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—order the joinder of the present case with case T-788/19;
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 37(1) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625;
—Infringement of the rule of equal treatment and sound administration;
—Infringement of Article 94(1)(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
—