EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-464/04: Order of the Court of First Instance of 30 June 2009 — Impala v Commission (Competition — Concentration — Sony BMG joint venture — Action becoming devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62004TB0464

62004TB0464

January 1, 2004
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

29.8.2009

Official Journal of the European Union

C 205/37

(Case T-464/04)

(Competition - Concentration - Sony BMG joint venture - Action becoming devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)

2009/C 205/69

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Independent Music Publishers and Labels Association (Impala, international association) (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Crosby and J. Golding, Solicitors, and I. Wekstein-Steg, lawyer)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: X. Lewis and K. Mojzesowicz, Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: Bertelsmann AG (Gütersloh, Germany) (represented by: P. Chappatte and J. Boyce, Solicitors); Sony BMG Music Entertainment BV (Vianen, Netherlands); and Sony Corporation of America (NewYork, New York, United States) (represented by N. Levy, Barrister, and by R. Snelders and T. Graf, lawyers)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2005/188/EC of 19 July 2004 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market and the functioning of the EEA Agreement (Case No COMP/M.3333 — Sony/BMG) (OJ 2005 L 62, p. 30).

Operative part of the order

1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.

2.Each party is to bear its own costs, both before the Court of First Instance and before the Court of Justice.

* * *

(1) OJ C 6, 8.1.2005.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia