I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Hydrogen peroxide and sodium perborate – Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC – Duration of infringement – Concept of ‘agreement’ and ‘concerted practice’ – Access to the file – Fines – Equal treatment – Leniency Notice – Duty to state reasons
3. Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Complex infringement with elements of an agreement and elements of a concerted practice – Single description as an ‘agreement and/or concerted practice’ – Lawfulness (Art. 81(1) EC) (see paras 60-62, 81)
4. Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Adverse effect on competition – Criteria for assessment – Anti-competitive purpose – Sufficient (Art. 81(1) EC) (see paras 113, 118, 157)
7. Competition – Administrative procedure – Observance of the rights of the defence – Access to the file – Scope – Non-communication of a document – Consequences – Need to draw a distinction, at the level of the burden of proof borne by the undertaking concerned, between inculpatory and exculpatory documents (Council Regulation No 1/2003, Art. 27(2)) (see paras 146-149)
10. Competition – Fines – Amount – Determination – Criteria – Gravity of the infringement – Single and continuous infringement – Taking into account of variations in intensity of the offending conduct (Council Regulation No 1/2003, Art. 23(3)) (see paras 191, 210)
12. Competition – Fines – Amount – Determination – Division of the undertakings in question into categories with a specific starting point – Lawfulness – Conditions – Judicial review (Council Regulation No 1/2003, Art. 23(2)) (see paras 220-221)
13. Competition – Fines – Amount – Determination – Criteria – Mitigating circumstances – Passive or ‘follow-my-leader’ role of the undertaking – Criteria for assessment (Council Regulation No 1/2003, Art. 23; Commission Notice 98/C 9/03, Section 3, first indent) (see paras 241-243, 252, 268)
14. Competition – Fines – Amount – Determination – Criteria – Mitigating circumstances – Conduct deviating from that agreed within the cartel – Assessment (Council Regulation No 1/2003, Art. 23; Commission Notice 98/C 9/03, Section 3) (see paras 269, 271-272)
15. Competition – Fines – Amount – Determination – Criteria – Taking into account of cooperation of the incriminated undertaking with the Commission outside the framework laid down by the leniency notice – Conditions – Limits (Council Regulation No 1/2003, Art. 23; Commission Notices 98/C 9/03, Section 3, and 2002/C 45/03, Section 23(b), third para.) (see paras 283, 285)
17. Competition – Fines – Amount – Determination – Deterrent effect – Criteria for assessing the deterrent effect (Council Regulation No 1/2003, Art. 23(2); Commission Notice 98/C 9/03) (see paras 305-306)
18. Competition – Community rules – Infringements – Attribution – Transfer of an area of business – Legal person responsible for the running of the undertaking at the time of the infringement (Art. 81(1) EC) (see paras 308, 310)
APPLICATION for partial annulment of Commission Decision C(2006) 1766 final of 3 May 2006 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/F/38.620 – Hydrogen peroxide and perborate) and for a reduction of the fine imposed on the applicant.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Solvay Solexis SpA to pay the costs.