I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-476/20) (*)
(EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - Withdrawal of the application for revocation - No need to adjudicate)
(2021/C 471/71)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Alteryx, Inc. (Irvine, California, United States) (represented by: A. Poulter and M. Holah, Solicitors)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: V. Ruzek, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Allocate Software Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: M. Howe, QC, A. Chantrielle, Barrister, E. Powell and B. Milloy, Solicitors)
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 May 2020 (Case R 1709/2019-4), relating to revocation proceedings between Allocate Software and Alteryx.
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.
2.Alteryx, Inc. and Allocate Software Ltd shall bear their own costs and shall each pay half of the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).
(*) Language of the case: English.
(1) OJ C 313, 21.9.2020.