- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-252/10 P: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 21 July 2011 — Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE v European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA) (Appeal — Public procurement — European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA) — Call for tenders relating to the ‘SafeSeaNet’ application — Decision rejecting a tenderer’s bid — Contract award criteria — Sub-criteria — Obligation to state reasons)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62010CA0252
62010CA0252
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 269/15
(Case C-252/10 P) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(Appeal - Public procurement - European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA) - Call for tenders relating to the ‘SafeSeaNet’ application - Decision rejecting a tenderer’s bid - Contract award criteria - Sub-criteria - Obligation to state reasons)
2011/C 269/24
Language of the case: English
Parties
Appellant: Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE (represented by: N. Korogiannakis, dikigoros)
Other party to the proceedings: European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA) (represented by: J. Menze, acting as Agent, and by J. Stuyck and A.-M. Vandromme, advocaaten)
Re:
Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 2 March 2010 in Case T-70/05 (Evropaïki Dynamiki v EMSA) in so far it dismissed the appellant’s application for the annulment of the decision of the European Maritime Safety Agency (‘EMSA’) of 6 January 2005 rejecting the tender submitted by the appellant in a tendering procedure relating to the validation of the SafeSeaNet application and its further development
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the appeal;
2.Orders Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE to pay the costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 221, 14.8.2010.