I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-769/21) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Action for annulment - Dumping - Imports of stainless steel cold-rolled flat products originating in China and Taiwan - Definitive anti-dumping duty - Act not of individual concern - Regulatory act entailing implementing measures - Inadmissibility)
(2023/C 71/41)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: European Association of Non-Integrated Metal Importers & distributors (Euranimi) (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: M. Campa, D. Rovetta, P. Gjørtler and V. Villante, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: K. Blanck and G. Luengo, acting as Agents)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1483 of 15 September 2021 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of stainless steel cold-rolled flat products originating in the People’s Republic of China and Taiwan following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ 2021 L 327, p. 1).
1.The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
2.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the European Steel Association (Eurofer)’s application to intervene.
3.European Association of Non-Integrated Metal Importers & distributors (Euranimi) shall pay the costs.
4.Euranimi, the European Commission and Eurofer shall each bear their own costs relating to Eurofer’s application to intervene.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 51, 31.1.2022.