- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-150/17: Action brought on 8 March 2017 — Asolo v EUIPO — Red Bull (FLÜGEL)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017TN0150
62017TN0150
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
24.4.2017
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 129/34
(Case T-150/17)
(2017/C 129/53)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Asolo LTD (Limassol, Cyprus) (represented by: W. Pors, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Red Bull GmbH (Fuschl am See, Austria)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘FLÜGEL’ — EU trade mark No 637 686
Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 17 November 2016 in Case R 282/2015-5
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision in its entirety;
—dismiss the application for a declaration of invalidity;
—order EUIPO and Red Bull to pay the costs.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 54(2) of Regulation No 207/2009;
—Infringement of Article 53(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.