- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-577/10: Action brought on 14 December 2010 — Trenzas y Cables de Acero v Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62010TN0577
62010TN0577
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
19.2.2011
Official Journal of the European Union
C 55/29
(Case T-577/10)
2011/C 55/52
Language of the case: Spanish
Parties
Applicant: Trenzas y Cables de Acero PSC, SL (Santander, Spain) (represented by F. González Díaz and A. Tresandi Blanco, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul, pursuant to Article 263 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the decision of the European Commission of 30 September 2010 amending the decision of 30 June 2010 (C(2010) 4837 final in Case COMP/38.344 — prestressing steel);
—in the alternative, annul, pursuant to Article 263 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Article 2 of the decision of the European Commission of 30 September 2010 amending the decision of 30 June 2010 (C(2010) 4837 final in Case COMP/38.344 — prestressing steel) insofar as it entails an infringement of the principle of non-discrimination in not having extended to TYCSA PSC the additional period for payment of the fine, and fails to state reasons; and
—order the European Commission to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
The pleas in law and main arguments are those already raised in Case T-575/10 Moreda-Riviere Trefilerías v Commission.