- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-616/19: Action brought on 12 September 2019 — Katjes Fassin v EUIPO — Haribo The Netherlands & Belgium (WONDERLAND)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TN0616
62019TN0616
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
28.10.2019
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 363/34
(Case T-616/19)
(2019/C 363/43)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Parties
Applicant: Katjes Fassin GmbH & Co. KG (Emmerich am Rhein, Germany) (represented by: T. Schmitz and M. Breuer, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Haribo The Netherlands & Belgium BV (Breda, Netherlands)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: Application for EU word mark WONDERLAND — Application No 16 263 295
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 July 2019 in Case R 2164/2019-4
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.