- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-401/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud (Czech Republic) lodged on 28 July 2011 — Blanka Soukupová v Ministerstvo zemědělství
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011CN0401
62011CN0401
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
22.10.2011
Official Journal of the European Union
C 311/19
(Case C-401/11)
2011/C 311/31
Language of the case: Czech
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Blanka Soukupová
Defendant: Ministerstvo zemědělství
Questions referred
1.May the concept of ‘normal retirement age’ at the time of transfer of a farm under Article 11 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999 of 17 May 1999 on support for rural development from the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) and amending and repealing certain Regulations be interpreted as ‘the age required for entitlement to a retirement pension’ by a particular applicant under national legislation?
2.If the answer to the first question is in the affirmative, is it in accordance with European Union law and the general principles of European Union law for ‘normal retirement age’ at the time of transfer of a farm to be determined differently for individual applicants depending on their sex and the number of children they have brought up?
3.If the answer to the first question is in the negative, what criteria should the national court take into account when interpreting the concept of ‘normal retirement age’ at the time of transfer of a farm under Article 11 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999 of 17 May 1999 on support for rural development from the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) and amending and repealing certain Regulations?
Language of the case: Czech
(1) OJ 1999 L 160, p. 80.