EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Rectification order of 13 June 2022.#ASL Aviation Holdings DAC and ASL Airlines (Ireland) Ltd v European Commission.#Rectification.#Case T-540/18.

ECLI:EU:T:2022:373

62018TO0540

June 13, 2022
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

ORDER OF THE GENERAL COURT (Seventh Chamber, Extended Composition)

13 June 2022 (*1)

(Rectification)

In Case T-540/18,

ASL Aviation Holdings DAC, established in Swords (Ireland),

ASL Airlines (Ireland) Ltd, established in Swords,

represented by N. Travers, Senior Counsel, H. Kelly, K. McKenna and R. Scanlan, Solicitors,

applicants,

European Commission, represented by N. Khan, P. Berghe, M. Farley and H. Leupold, acting as Agents,

defendant,

APPLICATION under Article 268 TFEU for compensation for the damage allegedly suffered by the applicants as a result of the unlawfulness of Commission Decision C(2013) 431 of 30 January 2013 declaring a concentration incompatible with the internal market and the functioning of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/M.6570 – UPS/TNT Express),

THE GENERAL COURT (Seventh Chamber, Extended Composition),

composed of S. Papasavvas, President, R. da Silva Passos, I. Reine, L. Truchot and M. Sampol Pucurull (Rapporteur), Judges,

Registrar: E. Coulon,

makes the following

1The Court delivered a judgment on 23 February 2022, ASL Aviation Holdings and ASL Airlines (Ireland) v Commission (T-540/18, ECLI:EU:T:2022:85).

2In accordance with Article 164(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court, it is necessary to rectify a clerical mistake found in the introductory part of that judgment, in the name of one of the representatives of the defendant.

On those grounds,

THE GENERAL COURT (Seventh Chamber, Extended Composition) hereby orders:

The introductory part of the judgment should read ‘European Commission, represented by N. Khan, P. Berghe, M. Farley and H. Leupold, acting as Agents’ instead of ‘European Commission, represented by N. Khan, P. Berghe, M. Farley and R. Leupold Henning, acting as Agents’.

Luxembourg, 13 June 2022.

Registrar

President

*1 Language of the case: English.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia