I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
2012/C 273/21
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Inter-Union Technohandel GmbH (Landau in der Pfalz, Germany) (represented by: K. Schmidt-Hern and A. Feutlinske, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Gumersport Mediterranea de Distribuciones, SL (Barcelona, Spain)
—Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 27 March 2012 in case R 413/2011-2; and
—Order OHIM to pay the costs of the applicant.
Applicant for a Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark ‘PROFLEX’ for goods and services in classes 9, 12 and 25
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant
Mark or sign cited in opposition: German trade mark registration No 39628817 for the word mark ‘PROFEX’, for goods in classes 6, 8, 9, 11, 12, 16, 17 and 21
Decision of the Opposition Division: Partially upheld the opposition
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulled the contested decision and rejected the opposition entirely
Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 42(2) and (3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 and Rule 22 of Commission Regulation (EC) no 2868/95.