I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-207/16)(Action for annulment - Measures never having been adopted - Request for a declaration that there is no need to adjudicate - Request that the application be interpreted as referring to a measure other than the contested measures - Dismissal - Manifest inadmissibility)
(2017/C 402/45)
Language of the case: Greek
Applicant: Aristoteleio Panepistimio Thessalonikis (Thessaloniki, Greece) (represented by: V. Christianos, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: S. Delaude and A. Katsimerou, acting as Agents)
Application for annulment of an alleged exclusion decision taken against the applicant and of an alleged decision to register the applicant and to activate the exclusion warning against the applicant in the Early Warning System (EWS) or in the Early Detection and Exclusion System (EDES)
1.The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.
2.The Commission shall bear its own costs in the main proceedings and in the application for interim measures, and shall pay two thirds of the costs of Aristoteleio Panepistimio Thessalonikis in those proceedings.
3.Aristoteleio Panepistimio Thessalonikis shall bear one third of its own costs in those proceedings.
(1) OJ C 251,11.7.2016