- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-679/20: Action brought on 13 November 2020 — Dr. August Wolff v EUIPO — Combe International (Vagisan)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TN0679
62020TN0679
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
18.1.2021
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 19/63
(Case T-679/20)
(2021/C 19/68)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Dr. August Wolff GmbH & Co. KG Arzneimittel (Bielefeld, Germany) (represented by: A. Thünken, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Combe International Ltd (New York, New York, United States)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the word mark Vagisan — International registration designating the European Union No 10 985 168
Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 3 September 2020 in Case R 2459/2019-4
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—annul the decision of the Cancellation Division of the EUIPO No 000018101 C of 11 September 2019,
—order the EUIPO and, as the case may be, the intervener to bear the costs of the proceedings and the costs incurred by proceedings before the EUIPO.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.