- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-153/25: Action brought on 7 March 2025 – Danube CCS Ventures v Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62025TN0153
62025TN0153
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2025/2232
22.4.2025
(Case T-153/25)
(C/2025/2232)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Danube CCS Ventures Kft. (Budapest, Hungary) (represented by: B. Hartnett and W. Sparks, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—Annul Commission Decision C(2024) 4582 final of 2 July 2024 on State aid SA.107009 (2024/N) – Sweden – Swedish biogenic CCS auction (‘Contested Decision’; and
—Order the defendant to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging that, by failing to open the formal investigation procedure, the Commission infringed Article 108(2) TFEU, in conjunction with Article 4(4) of the Council Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 of 13 July 2015 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (1), and essential principles of EU law including the principles of equal treatment and proportionality.
2.Second plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 296 TFEU on the ground that the Commission failed to state adequate reasoning in the Contested Decision.
—
(1) OJ L 248, 24.9.2015, p. 9.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2232/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—