I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C-362/06 P)
(Appeals - Conservation of natural habitats - List, adopted by a Commission decision, of sites of Community importance for the Boreal biogeographical region - Admissibility of an action for annulment brought by natural or legal persons against that decision)
2009/C 141/02
Language of the case: Finnish
Appellants: Markku Sahlstedt, Juha Kankkunen, Mikko Tanner, Toini Tanner, Liisa Tanner, Eeva Jokinen, Aili Oksanen, Olli Tanner, Leena Tanner, Aila Puttonen, Risto Tanner, Tom Järvinen, Runo K. Kurko, Maa- ja metsätaloustuottajain Keskusliitto MTK ry, MTK:n säätiö (represented by: K. Marttinen, asianajaja)
Other parties to the proceedings: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: M. Huttunen and M. van Beek, acting as Agents) Republic of Finland
Intervener in support of the Commission of the European Communities: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: F. Díez Moreno)
Appeal against the order of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities (First Chamber) of 22 June 2006 in Case T-150/05 Sahlstedt and Others v Commission of the European Communities dismissing as inadmissible an application for annulment of Commission Decision 2005/101/EC of 13 January 2005 adopting, pursuant to Council Directive 92/43/EEC, the list of sites of Community importance for the Boreal biogeographical region (OJ 2005 L 40, p. 1) — Concept of ‘direct concern’ within the meaning of Article 230 EC
The Court:
1.Dismisses the appeal;
2.Orders Mr Sahlstedt and Others to pay the costs;
3.Orders the Kingdom of Spain and the Republic of Finland to bear their own costs.
(1) OJ C 261, 28.10.2006