I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2016/C 402/60)
Language in which the application was lodged: French
Applicant: The Logistical Approach BV (Uden, the Netherlands) (represented by: R. Milchior, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Idea Groupe (Montoir de Bretagne, France)
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark containing the word element ‘Idealogistic’– Application for registration No 12 318 234
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20/06/2016 in Case R 1435/2015-4
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—principally, annul the contested decision;
—alternatively, amend the contested decision in that it wrongly confirmed the decision of the Opposition Division rejecting the registration of the mark 012318234 for the services ‘Consultancy in the field of logistics, including route selection, storage facilities and selection of means of transport’;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
—Infringement of Article 76 of Regulation No 207/2009;
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.