I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
C series
—
21.10.2024
(C/2024/6109)
Language of the case: German
Applicant: SHS – Stahl-Holding-Saar GmbH & Co. KGaA (Dillingen, Germany) (represented by: J. Meyer, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office
Trade mark at issue: Application for EU figurative mark Pure Steel+ – Application for registration No 18 830 287
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 June 2024 in Case R 189/2024-1
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs, including those incurred in the appeal proceedings.
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of the obligation to state reasons;
—Infringement of the principle of ex officio examination.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6109/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—