- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case F-102/14: Action brought on 6 October 2014 — ZZ v OHIM
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014FN0102
62014FN0102
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
12.1.2015
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 7/51
(Case F-102/14)
(2015/C 007/61)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: ZZ (represented by: Heinrich Tettenborn)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM)
Subject-matter and description of the proceedings
Annulment of the decision of OHIM to apply the clause contained in the applicant’s contract of employment — which provides for a termination of the applicant’s contract of employment in the event that the applicant is not placed on the reserve list of the next general selection procedure organised by EPSO for its functional group and specialising in industrial property — to selection procedures OHIM/AD/01/13 and OHIM/AST/02/13, and a claim for damages for the non-material damage arising from that decision
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—set aside the decision of OHIM, which was communicated to the applicant by letter from OHIM dated 28 November 2003, to apply the clause contained in Article 5 of the applicant’s contract of employment — which provides for a termination of the applicant’s contract of employment in the event that the applicant is not placed on the reserve list of the next general selection procedure organised by EPSO for its functional group and specialising in industrial property — to selection procedures OHIM/AD/01/13 and OHIM/AST/02/13, which were published on 31 October 2013;
—order OHIM to pay to the applicant damages of an appropriate amount at the discretion of the Court for the non-material damage arising from the decision of OHIM referred to in paragraph 1 above; and
—order OHIM to pay the costs.