I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-753/22)
(2023/C 24/108)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Applicant: Andrea Nieß (Kempen, Germany) (represented by: A. Erlenhardt, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Thema Products BV (Venlo, Netherlands)
Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: Application for EU word mark Gartenlux — Application No 18 391 572
Proceedings before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 13 September 2022 in Case R 608/2022-2
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision and the decision of the Opposition Division of 11 February 2022;
—order the intervener to pay the costs, including those incurred in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.
—Infringement of the second sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council in conjunction with Article 27 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/1430;
—Infringement of Article 109 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.