EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-447/14: Action brought on 16 June 2014 — nkt cables and NKT Holding v Commission

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014TN0447

62014TN0447

June 16, 2014
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

25.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 282/47

(Case T-447/14)

2014/C 282/61

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: nkt cables GmbH (Köln, Germany) and NKT Holding A/S (Brøndby, Denmark) (represented by: M. Kofmann and B. Creve, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:

Annul Commission Decision C(2014) 2139 of 2 April 2014 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 EEA in case AT.39610 — Power Cables (the ‘Decision’);

In the alternative, partially annul the Decision and substantially reduce the fine imposed on them;

Order the Commission to pay the costs;

Take any other measures that it considers appropriate.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicants rely on five pleas in law.

1.First plea in law, alleging that the Commission has infringed the applicants' rights of defence and the general principle of equality of arms, by refusing to allow them to access potentially exculpatory evidence received by the Commission after the notification of its Statement of Objections.

2.Second plea in law, alleging that Commission wrongly defined the territorial scope of the single and continuous infringement and erroneously applied the effects criterion.

3.Third plea in law, alleging that the Decision contained manifest errors of assessment in relation to the conduct in which NKT Cables was found to have been involved, and in relation to the conclusion that such conduct proved NKT Cables' participation in or awareness of all activities constituting the single and continuous infringement.

4.Fourth plea in law, alleging that the Commission erred in its findings as to the duration of NKT Cables' participation in the single and continuous infringement.

5.Fifth plea in law, alleging that the level of the fine which was imposed on the Applicants was unjustifiably and disproportionately high.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia