EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-208/17 P: Appeal brought on 21 April 2017 by NF against the order of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 28 February 2017 in Case T-192/16: NF v European Council

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017CN0208

62017CN0208

April 21, 2017
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C 231/12

(Case C-208/17 P)

(2017/C 231/16)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: NF (represented by: P. O’Shea, BL, I. Whelan, BL, B. Burns, Solicitor)

Other party to the proceedings: European Council

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Set aside the whole of the order of the General Court of 28 February 2017 by which the General Court held that the action be dismissed on the ground of the General Court’s lack of jurisdiction to hear and determine it;

Give a final judgment in the matter that is the subject of this appeal and hold that the General Court was wrong in law to decline jurisdiction and order the respondent in case T-192/16 to pay the costs of the appellant in respect of the order of the General Court and of the Court of Justice of the European Union in this appeal;

Remit the issues raised in these proceedings for adjudication back to the General Court with a direction that it should accept jurisdiction.

Pleas in law and main arguments

1.Failure to give reasons;

2.Failure to properly consider whether the challenged agreement was in reality a decision of the respondent;

3.Ignoring relevant factual issues;

4.Failure to consider evidence that was before it;

5.Failure to fully investigate and assess material issues;

6.Failure to make further relevant enquiries;

7.Making a decision without the benefit of sufficient information;

8.Disregarding the principles established by the Court in case C-294/83.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia