- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-795/21: Judgment of the General Court of 14 September 2022 — Protectoplus v EUIPO (Li-SAFE) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark Li-SAFE — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Restriction of the goods designated in the trade mark application)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TA0795
62021TA0795
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 432/30
(Case T-795/21) (*)
(EU trade mark - Application for EU word mark Li-SAFE - Absolute grounds for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Restriction of the goods designated in the trade mark application)
(2022/C 432/37)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Protectoplus (Rendsburg, Germany) (represented by: W. Riegger, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Klee and E. Markakis, acting as Agents)
Re:
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 6 October 2021 (Case R 845/2021-1).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Protectoplus GmbH to pay the costs.
(*)
Language of the case: German.
OJ C 73, 14.2.2022.