- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-53/15: Action brought on 28 January 2015 — credentis v OHIM — Aldi Karlslunde (Curodont)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015TN0053
62015TN0053
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
30.3.2015
Official Journal of the European Union
C 107/33
(Case T-53/15)
(2015/C 107/43)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: credentis AG (Windisch, Switzerland) (represented by: D. Breuer, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Aldi Karlslunde K/S (Karlslunde, Denmark)
Details of the proceedings before OHIM
Applicant: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘Curodont’ — Application for registration No 10 332 807
Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 13 November 2014 in Case R 353/2014-1
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—Annul the contested decision;
—Order OHIM and Aldi Karlslunde to pay the costs.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.