- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-874/16: Judgment of the General Court of 8 November 2018 — RA v Court of Auditors (Civil service – Officials – Promotion – 2016 promotion exercise – Decision not to promote the applicant to grade AD 11 – No staff report – Comparison of merits)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TA0874
62016TA0874
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 4/24
(Case T-874/16) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
(Civil service - Officials - Promotion - 2016 promotion exercise - Decision not to promote the applicant to grade AD 11 - No staff report - Comparison of merits)
(2019/C 4/33)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: RA (represented by: S. Orlandi and T. Martin, lawyers)
Defendant: European Court of Auditors (represented by: C. Lesauvage, E. von Bardeleben and A.-M. Cosciug, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application based on Article 270 TFEU seeking annulment of the decision of the Court of Auditors of 4 March 2016 not to promote the applicant to the next grade (AD 11), in the 2016 promotion procedure, by not including his name in the list of officials promoted in the 2016 promotion exercise.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Annuls the decision of the European Court of Auditors of 4 March 2016 not to promote RA to grade AD 11 in the 2016 promotion exercise;
2.The Court of Auditors is ordered to pay all the costs.
(<span class="note"> <a id="ntr1-C_2019004EN.01002402-E0001" href="#ntc1-C_2019004EN.01002402-E0001">*1</a> </span>) OJ C 46, 13.2.2017.